Dbq Essay Crickets and Politics

The relationship in the midst of play and politics is intelligibly portrayed in due south Asia from 1880 to 2005 through and through the easing of the tension amid diverse rank members, although the tension eased was non al slipway from a phantasmal formula between the Pakistanis, Indians, and the British. The incompatible problems that arose in South Asia was more(prenominal) or lessly class or caste governances (Docs 2, 3, 4), arguing (Docs 1, 6, 10), and religious tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the different countries and play police squads. exercise in many ways was a unifying force for the different classes in India as well as the relationship between Britain and India.As seen in enrol workforcet 2, an Indian cricketer was invited to join the Sussex police squad up, which was a team from England. This shows some equating between the British and the Indians because the British typic in ally saw the Indians as reject than them in standards. However, th is paper could buzz off left some things out and employ as a stemma of propaganda see that it was published by a British newspaper. (POV) This fraternity between the British and the Indians female genital organ in any case be seen in text file 3 because in the opinion of an side cricketer and historian, he felt that Cricket unites the regulations and the ruled. The ruler in this case was Britain and the ruled was India. Cricket was said to be one of the most civilizing influences, and the one that did least harm, because rather than reservation the Indians grief all over the item that they were non an independent country, they gave them the swashswoman of cricket, a source of happiness, moral training, and more. A sense of equality derriere be seen in memorandum 4 between the different castes in India. A lower caste Hindoo was allowed to be on a team just because he was good at cricket.The separatewise team members took him into the team and neglected the occ urrence that they werent from the same caste. This is a truly of the essence(predicate) example of unanimity because in history, different caste systems were never allowed to mix. For example, a lower caste charr could non marry a higher(prenominal) caste man. Accepting a lower caste Hindu in a higher caste cricket team is a turn in history. hitherto though cricket was a very uniting force, it was also the cause of controversy throughout India. Cricket was a sport brought to India by the British and the Indians were pretty welcome towards the British for bringing cricket.However, what they were not acceptable for was the fact that the English would play polo on cricket solid grounds, as said in instrument 1. scroll 1 states that more than five hundred young men of all ages and of all castes pursue this preventive sport on the Parade ground where alone they are permitted to play and which is the scarcely ground suitable for cricket. The Indians were arguing to the governor of the province of Bombay, India that the English were ruining the superoxide dismutase that they were vie cricket on by playing polo. They requested that the English should play somewhere else and not on their turf.Furthermore, shown in Document 6, the Indians felt that when they defeated the European teams of Calcutta , that it was the only time they were playing on the same level as the English. beauteous and square. Usually, the British would have the authority strength wise, hardly the feisty of cricket evened it all out because when you play a sport, you cant win by support, alone by skill. Document 10 showed another(prenominal) example of rivalry. The chairwoman notions that Cricket is a sport that can bring large number together and makes people ignore the fact that there are problems with water and etc.However, hes not one to joint these things. Cricket has brought Indians and Pakistanis together in so many ways, just like the chairman said, We consider culture. We share a history. We share so much. Lastly, cricket played an important role in the religious tensions between the Indians and Pakistanis or the Hindus and Muslims. Muhammad Ali Jinnah said in Document 5 that he hopes that the game of cricket t distributivelyes the different religious sides to unite and not fight most who won the game or lost the game. He believes that cricket has many lessons to t severally in other walks of life. This showed that although the religious tension was so dandy that they had to make twain different countries for each religious side, they could still embrace the fact that they both share a viridity interest, cricket. In Document 7, an editorial in the Indian sports journal, they said that the purpose of the quadrangular Tournament, a big cricket competition, has changed over the years due to some self-concern loss leaders, who wanted to gain ends by inspiration up religious fanaticism. They have dour the sport of cricket into a spo rt of religious rivalry.However, this editorial still agrees with the fact that cricket did not harm. This was an editorial so this article must have been very biased in their opinions on this subject. Having opinions in an article is a very muscular force because some opinions can race people and change their thoughts and ideas about something into something different. (POV) Mohandas Gandhi, the leader of the Indian independency movement and the phonate of Document 8 also agrees with Document 7. Gandhi believes that having the Tournaments between religious beliefs is ridiculous.He says that if the Tournaments were between colleges and institutions, he could understand, but to have the Tournaments be between Hindu, Parsi, Muslim, and other religious teams is not understandable. Segregating teams by religious belief gave no way for competition to nominate up. The game just became more of a religious movement. Document 9 shows a clear sense obvious religious tension. The Hindu s tone of voice that they are the superior religion and when the Hindus lose a game of cricket, the Muslims should not be celebrating but mourning for the Hindus loss.I feel that this is very biased because it was written by the founder of a Hindu superpatriotic organization and it is a very self-serving statement as well. Cricket should be a fair game and each side has their own choice of mourning or celebrating. The Hindus should not have to be the judge on who can hold on and who can be sad. (POV) I feel that it would be helpful if there were two extra rolls explaining the cricket and politics connection even more in depth.One of the documents should be from a lower- caste cricket musician and the other one should be from a higher-caste cricket player because most of the documents condition were from a high status call for of view. They were all newspapers, organizations, or high-class leaders. self-aggrandizing the input from a lower-caste would give us an input on how they felt about the whole class situation in cricket. Did they think it was fair? Did they feel as if they were being treated equally or were they still looked down upon? The other document from the higher-caste cricket player would give insight on how they felt about the lower-caste playing on their teams.How did they feel about it? Do they feel like they betrayed their caste system or was it still the same? In conclusion, cricket was not only a unifying sport between Indians-Pakistanis and Indians-British, it was also a sport that caused some rivalry and religious tensions. All sides had equal take a chance in winning the sport and for once, the British wouldnt have to start at the top, which gave the Indians a sense of nationalism and independence in a way. Cricket gave these sides a different way of expressing their rivalry between each other instead of bloodshed.