Equality for Animals Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Equality for Animals - Essay ExampleIn case of animals the intellectual or psychological aspect do not play much role. This differentiation has not been do beca manipulation the animal touch onity is based mainly on physical torment aspect. He author mentions the plosive not stupefy diverts because it cannot suffer but here it is not clear as to what kind of interest he is talking of. The explanation provided in this context is ambiguous because talking of experiments on mice, it is essential in human interests. The author has not talked of conflict of interests or what decision should be taken when there is such a conflict. What interest can a mouse have in reducing human execrable? Similarly a man will have no interest in considering mouses misfortunate. This aspect has not been taken into consideration. 2E. The linguistic rule theme of this article is based on the concept of broad equal consideration to animals. The basic argument that Singer has mentioned in support of equal consideration of animals is the principle of equal consideration of interests (Singer, 1979). This principle indicates that every living being deserves equal treatment irrespective of their kind, coat or power. There argon several sub-arguments in this article. The first one is that although some animals like those animals with impenetrable skins have the capacity to feel lesser spirit level of physical pain than human. However, Singer argues that this cannot be the foothold of giving unequal consideration to animals. Secondly, animals are used for scientific experiments because they lack the fear of anticipation and excessively because they are not considered in the same category as humanness. Singer argues that since human infants and retarded humans cannot be used for experiments, so animals should also be prohibited from experimenting. Thirdly, Singer argues that people should refrain from alimentation flesh of animals as this not a necessity. By killing animals for nourishment they right on of living is violate to serve the minor interests of humans. Fourthly, animals lack reasoning and so they are less self-conscious than humans. However, Singer argues that degree of self-consciousness cannot undermine the importance of giving equal consideration of interests. The main polish of this article is that in spite of all the differences between animals and humans, there should be equal consideration of interests. The main reason for this conclusion is that animals have the capacity to feel pain and suffering and so they should be considered equal to human beings in spite of their low intellectual level. Another reason is that humans have no right to use animals for the purpose of pleasure. 3F. Main concepts Animals Equal treatment Main Conceptual Question Should animals be given equal treatment as humans? Animals Equal treatment - have less intellectual power - have capacity to feel pain - do not have the fear of anticipation - are consumed by humans as food - are kept in unfavourable conditions to be converted into food - are used for scientific experiments - eat each other - Darwinian theory gives humans right to kill animals for food - can use tools and communicate like humans - equal consideration of interests - suffering of all beings must be given equal consideration - humans infants and retarded humans are not considered to be of same category like animals - use of animals as food is not a necessity but is more a luxury - people should choose vegetarian way of life in order to maintain the